M-PESA is not a Kenyan Innovation
@ http://www.gmeltdown.com/2009/12/m-pesa-is-not-kenyan-innovation.html
Labels:
innovation,
intellectual property,
kenyan,
knowledge economy,
M-PESA,
michael joseph,
patriotism,
safaricom,
sagentia,
socio-political crisis,
Tanzania,
technology,
vodaphone,
YuCash,
ZAP
Many Kenyans still believe that 'their' Safaricom owns the patents to
the M-PESA innovation. Some Kenyans even claim that Safaricom hijacked
their idea and developed it into M-PESA - a court case was once reported
on this. The reality being that the system was 'developed' by Sagentia
on behalf of Vodafone, it goes without saying that the corresponding
intellectual property (IP) does not belong to Safaricom. That is also
not to forget that Kenya has enough software development capacity to
build such a system on a robust platform.
Safaricom is paying patent fees to Vodafone just like any other network operator who will wish to use the money transfer platform. It might help for Michael Joseph to clarify if any benefits accrue to himself or others in Safaricom specifically for accepting to be the test platform for "Vodafone's innovation". Such a clarification should of course address the opportunity cost of a more direct contribution to Kenya's knowledge economy through the apparently foregone IP ownership.
Safaricom is paying patent fees to Vodafone just like any other network operator who will wish to use the money transfer platform. It might help for Michael Joseph to clarify if any benefits accrue to himself or others in Safaricom specifically for accepting to be the test platform for "Vodafone's innovation". Such a clarification should of course address the opportunity cost of a more direct contribution to Kenya's knowledge economy through the apparently foregone IP ownership.
I would like to suggest that if for any other reason M-PESA does not
succeed in other markets outside Kenya, it will be because the M-PESA is
merely a Kenyan innovation, whose success is a direct derivative of
Kenya's patriotism. As such the innovation's success may not be
replicated where the corresponding patriotic emotion is inexistent.
Consider the patriotism displayed in the oversubscription of the
Safaricom IPO of 2008. Consider the fanatical self imposed network
(Safaricom) lock-in of over 14 million Kenyans. Then you might start
understanding the success of M-PESA in Kenya. Many Kenyans found M-PESA
compelling merely because it was supposed to be a 'Kenyan Invention'.
Indeed the M-PESA success story may not be complete without mentioning
the sense of belonging and patriotism of Kenyans as an aftermath of
2007/8 election crisis.
Had the 5+ Millions of M-PESA users initially learnt some of the facts in Olga Morawczynski's
article - What you don't know about M-PESA,
the service might as well have been struggling as is the case with the
Vodacom's attempt in Tanzania. Consider the question - why are ZAP and
YuCash - alternatives to MPESA not yet success stories? In my opinion,
the technological platform could have been developed by anyone else -
including our own software developers. The business processes addressing
the socio-economic context could only have come from the Kenyan
populace - regardless of who eventually incorporated them into the
software.
I am sure at some point in history, the social scientists will have
something to say about the role of Kenya's social-political crisis of
2007 and 2008 in the M-PESA success story.
No comments:
Post a Comment